Connect with us

Europe

Italy slams door on people hoping to claim citizenship through great-grandparents

Published

on


For travel tips, recipes and more insight on Italian culture, sign up for CNN’s Unlocking Italy newsletter. This eight-part guide will have you packing your bags in no time.

Rome
CNN
 — 

A great-grandparent or even a great-great grandparent from Italy used to be all it took to guarantee Italian citizenship. A surprise decree has now changed all that, making it much harder for those with Italian ancestry to use blood line as a pathway to become Italian.

On March 28, the Italian government tightened regulations for claiming citizenship by jus sanguinis, or descendent blood line, effective immediately. The law will go to parliament to be ratified in 60 days, and some changes could be introduced, but for the moment new applications for citizenship must meet new requirements.

The sudden change affects thousands of people all over the world hoping for or preparing to obtain an Italian passport, which ranks third in the world for visa-free or visa-on-arrival travel, according to the Henley Passport Index, making it one of the most coveted and, until now, easiest to acquire.

Under the new regulations, applicants must have at least one Italian parent or grandparent to apply under jus sanguinis. They must also demonstrate Italian language proficiency, which was previously only needed for naturalization through residency or marriage. The proficiency test is a five-part state exam held several times a year, or a higher level equivalency test for those not living in Italy.

At the moment applicants do not have to be currently living in Italy, but do need to have previously lived in the country for three years to be eligible.

Previously, anyone with an Italian ancestor who was alive after March 17, 1861, when the Kingdom of Italy was created, qualified for citizenship, a process that takes about two years with expenses ranging from the cost of notarizing and translating documents to to thousands of dollars to hire companies to do all the legwork.

That meant that even if one’s parents and grandparents did not obtain citizenship, people could still apply based on a great-grandparent or a generation even further back.

The decree, published in Italy’s official gazette of laws on March 28 is meant to crack down on “abusers” who become Italian as a “novelty” or to ease travel restrictions, according to Italy’s foreign minister Antonio Tajani.

“Being an Italian citizen is a serious matter, the granting of citizenship is a serious matter,” Tajani said Friday. “Unfortunately over the years there have been abuses and requests for citizenship that went a bit beyond the true interest in our country.”

Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs Antonio Tajani says previous citizenship rules were open to abuse.

Between 2014 and 2024, the number of Italian citizens residing abroad increased by 40%, from 4.6 million to 6.4 million, mostly in Argentina and Brazil, the foreign ministry said. The Italian consulate in Argentina processed 30,000 applications in 2024, up by 10,000 from the previous year. And in Brazil, consulate officials processed 20,000 requests in 2024, up from 14,000 in 2023, the ministry said.

Most of those people have no direct contact with the country, do not pay taxes in Italy, and do not vote, Tajani said. He added that the reform was necessary because “citizenship cannot be automatic for those who have an ancestor who emigrated centuries ago, without any cultural or linguistic ties to the country.”

Italy does not allow citizenship based on jus soli or birthright, meaning even people born in Italy are not automatically granted citizenship and must instead wait 18 years to apply and prove that they lived legally in the country for 10 of those.

The new regulation does not impact any of the 60,000 applications currently pending in consulates across the world, but it does impact how those who do qualify for citizenship apply in the future.

Consulates will no longer process applications, which will be centralized and processed online via the national government in Italy, and which will require an in-person interview. Consulates around the world have cancelled many blood line citizenship appointments scheduled after March 28, according to the Foreign Ministry’s office.

Samantha Wilson, CEO of Smart Move Italy, which helps facilitate citizenship applications, says she is telling her clients who are pursuing citizenship by descent not to give up — at least not yet.

“The Tajani Decree has created fear, confusion, and for some, a sense of loss,” she told CNN. “This decree, in our view, is constitutionally weak. It was rushed through as an emergency measure, bypassing the normal democratic process, and we fully expect it to be challenged — by the courts, by the legal community, and by us.”

She says one of her clients who had been planning to move to Italy to apply in person on April 1 has now canceled her trip because of the uncertainty. Another of her clients in her property division just closed on a property in Italy, she says, but now doesn’t want to buy it since she won’t be able to get her Italian citizenship under the new rules. She has already signed contracts and is obligated by law to carry on with the purchase, says Wilson.

Italy has one of the world's most powerful passports.

The law also extends to Italian citizens who were not born in Italy. They can now only pass on citizenship to children born outside of Italy if they have lived in Italy for two consecutive years.

Additionally, Italian citizens with dual nationality will lose their Italian citizenship if they “don’t engage” by paying taxes, voting and renewing their passports and ID cards. That means people who were granted citizenship but don’t ever come to Italy may not be able to keep it, according to the decree as it is currently written.

Those who marry an Italian must live in Italy for at least two years to qualify for citizenship through marriage. And the cost to apply has doubled, from 300 to 600 euros (from $324 to $648).

Italians who were born in Italy, but now live abroad, can still pass their citizenship on to their own children, but must register the birth in Italy.

“For those who are applying through court and are ready, we’re doing everything we can to file their cases before the decree is ratified. That short window could make a difference if transitional provisions are expanded when the law is converted,” Wilson told CNN.

“For those who are not yet ready to file, the only option now is to wait — for Parliament’s decision within the 60-day window, for the Constitutional Court’s hearing in June, and beyond that, for the outcomes of what will likely be years of court challenges. We’ll be filing many of them.”

CNN interviewed one person, who did not want to be named in case it hurts their case, who has just moved to Rome in March in the hope of getting citizenship from a great-grandmother, who moved to South America during World War II.

Under the new regulations, they do not qualify even though their father, who was born in South America, has Italian citizenship. They’re hoping to find a lawyer who can act as a guide through the complicated process. “I have all the paperwork, everything translated, notarized, and ready for my appointment in mid-April,” they told CNN. “If they don’t cancel it, I will have a chance, but I feel like I’ve made the worst mistake of my life.”

CNN also reached an American family of seven en route to Italy aboard a cruise ship to pursue citizenship based on a great-grandparent who emigrated to the US but never became a US citizen.

The family, which includes teenagers and young adults, signed a long-term lease to establish residency and have booked appointments with the local community in Italy to apply for permits to stay based on their quest for citizenship — requirements for applying for citizenship prior to March 28.

They also say they spent tens of thousands of dollars to translate and notarize all the documents relating to the great grandfather. Now, under the new regulations, they no longer qualify and have no idea what obstacles they will face once they arrive since everything they plan to do is based on requirements no longer recognized.

“We were following Italian law, and we were following the procedures at the Italian government and uprooted our whole lives to move to Italy under the laws at the time when we got on the ship March 23,” they told CNN. “Making this change with no notice at all has stranded a bunch of families in Italy who now don’t have a legal standing and has essentially made us homeless in the middle of the Atlantic on a cruise ship.”

Salvatore Livreri, an Italian who works as an orthodontist in South Carolina, told CNN that he feels the new law isn’t carefully thought out.

“This not only crushes the dreams of the children of the Italian diaspora who seek recognition of citizenship in order to return to their ancestral homeland, but also strips the rights of citizens such as myself who have children abroad to transmit my Italian citizenship to them,” he told CNN after posting his thoughts on an online community for Italian citizens abroad.

“It creates a two-tier caste system whereby some citizens can transmit their citizenship to their children, but second-class citizens like myself cannot do so. For generations, Italian culture has endured because of the strength of family ties. These ties are in the blood. Italians have always known this.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Europe

Marine Le Pen: Trump publicly backs France’s far-right figurehead after her conviction

Published

on



CNN
 — 

US President Donald Trump has thrown his support behind another embattled far-right European leader, backing Marine Le Pen after French presidential hopeful was convicted of embezzlement and barred from political office.

“FREE MARINE LE PEN,” Trump wrote on Truth Social on Friday, calling the court ruling a “Witch Hunt.”

The message is the latest high-profile endorsement from his administration of a far-right party in Europe and comes as Trump upends decades of post-World War Two security guarantees towards the continent with his “America First” foreign and trade policies.

Le Pen’s hopes of becoming France’s president in 2027 were cut short on Monday when a Paris court blocked her from standing for office for five years, after she was found guilty of embezzling European Union funds. The figurehead of the far-right National Rally (RN) party had been seen as the front-runner for the next election, and the ruling has thrown French politics into disarray.

“I don’t know Marine Le Pen, but do appreciate how hard she worked for so many years,” Trump wrote.

“She suffered losses, but kept on going, and now, just before what would be a Big Victory, they get her on a minor charge that she probably knew nothing about – Sounds like a ‘bookkeeping’ error to me.”

“It is all so bad for France, and the Great French People, no matter what side they are on,” Trump said.

The presiding judge in Le Pen’s case, Bénédicte de Perthuis, said the politician’s actions amounted to a “serious and lasting attack on the rules of democratic life in Europe, but especially in France.”

In addition to the ban, she was handed a four-year prison sentence with two years suspended, to be served under house arrest, and a €100,000 ($108,000) fine.

Le Pen, the daughter of Jean-Marie Le Pen, who founded her party when it was known as the National Front, slammed the ruling as a purely “political decision” in a television interview, and claimed the “rule of law [had been] completely violated.” She plans to appeal, her lawyer said.

Trump called the conviction a “very big deal” on Monday, drawing parallels with his own legal entanglements. His comments on Friday went further, with pointed criticism of European politicians.

“The Witch Hunt against Marine Le Pen is another example of European Leftists using Lawfare to silence Free Speech, and censor their Political Opponent, this time going so far as to put that Opponent in prison,” said Trump.

There is no indication Le Pen will serve time in prison.

Trump’s sentiment echoes that of his top advisor Elon Musk who also publicly decried Le Pen’s sentence earlier this week, writing on his platform X: “When the radical left can’t win via democratic vote, they abuse the legal system to jail their opponents.”

The Trump administration has railed against perceived attacks on other far-right politicians in Europe, including a court decision to re-run the Romanian presidential election, which saw a surprise win by a far-right candidate.

The country’s constitutional court voided the initial result after declassified intelligence reports uncovered possible Russian interference in Calin Georgescu’s TikTok-fueled campaign. A re-run is scheduled for May, but Georgescu has been barred from running.

Vice President JD Vance has also publicly backed far-right groups in Europe, including the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in Germany.

Musk has also backed the AfD, urging Germans to vote for the right-wing group in elections earlier this year, as well as English far-right figure Tommy Robinson. The AfD almost doubled its vote share and surged into second place in the polls, behind the center-right Christian Democratic Union.



Source link

Continue Reading

Europe

April 3, 2025: Donald Trump presidency news

Published

on


Charts that show the “reciprocal tariffs” the U.S. is charging other countries are on display at the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House yesterday in Washington, DC.

“How did Trump calculate the first column of tariffs charged to the US?” Juan in Nicaragua asks.

At first, trade economists were flummoxed by how the tariffs had been calculated.

But the crude methodology used by the White House to calculate the list of “reciprocal” global tariffs has since become clear.

The Trump administration used a simple formula: It took each country’s trade deficit with the US, divided it by the value of that country’s exports to the US – and then divided this figure by half, in a gesture of “kindness.”

Let’s take this step-by-step, using official US data and the example of Vietnam, which President Donald Trump claimed imposed a 90% tariff on US goods and therefore would get a 46% “reciprocal” tariff of its own.

In 2024, Vietnam, a massive and growing global manufacturing hub, sold $136.6 billion worth of goods to the US.

Because Americans want to buy things like Nike shoes a lot more than Vietnamese want to buy things like Ford cars, the US sold a lot less to Vietnam. Vietnam bought just $13.1 billion of goods from the US that same year.

Subtracting $13.1 billion from $136.6 billion gives Vietnam a trade surplus of $123.5 billion with the US. But one man’s trade surplus is another man’s trade deficit – which Trump has made clear he finds unpalatable, akin to being “ripped off.”

Dividing the $123.5 billion by $136.6 billion (the value of Vietnam’s exports to the US) gives 0.90 – or, in percentage terms, 90%. In a supposed act of “kindness,” Trump nearly halved this, meaning Vietnam will “only” now face a tariff of 46%.

With few exceptions, the White House repeated this methodology for all countries on its tariff chart. To be clear, these countries are being punished for having trade surpluses with the US – not because they had imposed a “tariff” on goods traded with the world’s largest economy.

The trend was first pointed out by James Surowiecki, a financial writer, in a post on X.

This post has been updated with additional information.



Source link

Continue Reading

Europe

Stunning images show Arctic glaciers’ dramatic retreat

Published

on



CNN
 — 

Editor’s Note: Call to Earth is a CNN editorial series committed to reporting on the environmental challenges facing our planet, together with the solutions. Rolex’s Perpetual Planet Initiative has partnered with CNN to drive awareness and education around key sustainability issues and to inspire positive action.

Swedish photographer Christian Aslund is riding a small boat along the coast of Spitsbergen, an island in the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard. Here, deep into the Arctic Circle and midway between Norway and the north pole, he is investigating the health of the glaciers, by comparing them to what they looked like in archival photos.

He takes a picture, trying to place his boat in the exact position occupied by an explorer who took a similar photograph over 100 years ago. But the difference is striking: in the shot from 1918, the boat is heading towards a massive glacier. In the image Aslund took in 2024, he is heading toward what looks like almost bare land.

The comparison is part of a series that Aslund worked on in collaboration with the Norwegian Polar Institute and Greenpeace, to document the retreat of Svalbard’s glaciers over the last century. He visited the area twice — in 2002 and in 2024 — and picked which sites to photograph based on historical images that he found in the institute’s archives.

Top: Archive image from Kongsfjorden with the glacier Blomstrandbreen in the background in 1918, from the Norwegian Polar Institute archive (Reference n. NP002571)

Bottom: taken in the same location by photographer Christian Aslund. 27th August 2024.

Greenpeace has commissioned photographer Christian Aslund to continue a project he began in 2002 - to carry out visual research of glaciers in Svalbard and document their retreat over time. While sailing aboard the Greenpeace vessel ‘Witness’, Aslund revisited glaciers he first documented in 2002 as well as photographing others, new to this project.

The Arctic has been warming more than twice as fast as the rest of the world, due to
Top: Archive image from Kongsfjorden with the glacier Blomstrandbreen in the background in 1918, from the Norwegian Polar Institute archive (Reference n. NP002571)

Bottom: taken in the same location by photographer Christian Aslund. 27th August 2024.

Greenpeace has commissioned photographer Christian Aslund to continue a project he began in 2002 - to carry out visual research of glaciers in Svalbard and document their retreat over time. While sailing aboard the Greenpeace vessel ‘Witness’, Aslund revisited glaciers he first documented in 2002 as well as photographing others, new to this project.

The Arctic has been warming more than twice as fast as the rest of the world, due to


© Christian Åslund / Norwegian Polar Institute / Greenpeace

“In 2002, the widespread knowledge, or acceptance, of climate change wasn’t as broad as it is now,” Aslund says. He published the first set of photos over 20 years ago to create awareness of how much the glaciers were receding. But to his surprise, he received some comments suggesting that the images had been “Photoshopped,” that the glaciers were just expanding and contracting naturally, or that he had taken the pictures in the summer and compared them to archival shots taken in the winter: “But they are not — if you look at at the archive photos, you see that they don’t have any sea ice and not enough snow on the mountains (for it to be winter). And also, in the winter, it’s permanently dark.”

In the summer of 2024, he decided to return, taking pictures at the exact same locations as before. “I had a feeling that the glaciers would have receded even more,” he says, “and that was confirmed. We wanted to show that these glaciers are not going back and forth. They are constantly being pulled back by a warming climate. It’s a major difference.”

The Arctic has been warming twice as fast as the rest of the world since the year 2000, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, but according to other estimates it has warmed even more — four times faster than the global average since 1979. NASA says summer Arctic sea ice is shrinking by 12.2% per decade due to warming temperatures.

As sea ice melts, it reflects much less heat back into space, and that heat is instead absorbed by the seawater. The melting of glaciers, on the other hand, contributes to a rise in the global sea level, which carries the risk of submerging inhabited areas. “Both are melting in response to warming temperatures,” says Julienne Stroeve, a professor of Polar Observation and Modelling at University College London, who adds that the fresh water that goes into the ocean can also disrupt global ocean currents and have disruptive biological implications for marine life.

Top: Historical image from Norwegian Polar Institute's archive (Reference n. NP036941) showing the Conwaybreen glacier, taken in 1925, NY-Alesund, Svalbard.

Bottom: Photo taken from the same position, on 23rd August 2024.

Greenpeace has commissioned photographer Christian Aslund to continue a project he began in 2002 - to carry out visual research of glaciers in Svalbard and document their retreat over time. While sailing aboard the Greenpeace vessel ‘Witness’, Aslund revisited glaciers he first documented in 2002 as well as photographing others, new to this project.
 
The Arctic has been warming more than twice as fast as the rest of the world, due to
Top: Historical image from Norwegian Polar Institute's archive (Reference n. NP036941) showing the Conwaybreen glacier, taken in 1925, NY-Alesund, Svalbard. Bottom: Photo taken from the same position, on 23rd August 2024. Greenpeace has commissioned photographer Christian Aslund to continue a project he began in 2002 - to carry out visual research of glaciers in Svalbard and document their retreat over time. While sailing aboard the Greenpeace vessel ‘Witness’, Aslund revisited glaciers he first documented in 2002 as well as photographing others, new to this project. The Arctic has been warming more than twice as fast as the rest of the world, due to


© Christian Åslund / Norwegian Polar Institute / Greenpeace

“Over the last century we have seen a reduction of the overall amount of ice in the Arctic Ocean, reducing in area and thickness,” Stroeve continues. “Today’s end-of-summer ice cover is 40-50% less than it was 100 years ago and all climate models and observationally based studies suggest the first ice-free summers will occur by 2050.” This, she adds, will create a profound transformation and is something that hasn’t occurred for at least 130,000 years. It will further warm the Arctic, leading to enhanced ice melt from places like Greenland, and thaw permafrost, destabilizing communities all around the Arctic Ocean.

Aslund says that when he released the latest pictures from his 2024 series, he faced some of the same criticism that he received in 2002. “I’m amazed how in 2024 people are still not believing what they see. The whole point of this project is that an image shows more than a thousand words, and that this is real, but still people have problems believing in it,” he says.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if 10 years from now, most of what we documented will completely disappear. Unfortunately, if we don’t pull any major handbrake very soon, I think that will be that will be the case.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending