Connect with us

Education

Trump set to sign executive order shuttering the Education Department

Published

on


President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order Thursday to close the Education Department, fulfilling a yearslong pledge to dismantle the federal agency, the White House confirmed.

Trump will hold an event at the White House to sign the order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure the Department of Education and return education authority to the States, while continuing to ensure the effective and uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.”

USA Today first reported that Trump will sign the order Thursday.

Follow live politics coverage here

Formally closing the department requires an act of Congress. But even without formally shutting it down, the Trump administration could effectively make it nearly impossible for employees to carry out their work, as it has done with the U.S. Agency for International Development.

President Jimmy Carter established the department in 1979 after Congress passed the Department of Education Organization Act in bipartisan votes.

McMahon recently moved to drastically reduce the size of the Education Department by cutting its workforce in half. She called the job terminations the first step toward shutting down the department.

“That was the president’s mandate,” McMahon said last week in an interview with Fox News. “His directive to me, clearly, is to shut down the Department of Education, which we know we’ll have to work with Congress, you know, to get that accomplished.”

McMahon similarly vowed at her Senate confirmation hearing to work with Congress to advance Trump’s plan to dismantle the department. She telegraphed in an email to employees this month that major changes were coming.

“Our job is to respect the will of the American people and the President they elected, who has tasked us with accomplishing the elimination of bureaucratic bloat here at the Department of Education—a momentous final mission—quickly and responsibly,” she wrote, according to a copy obtained by NBC News.

The Senate confirmed McMahon in a 51-45 vote. No Democrat voted for her.

Trump has suggested that he could garner enough congressional support to formally close the department, characterizing teachers unions as more of a threat to the plan than lawmakers.

“I think I’d work with Congress,” Trump said last month in the Oval Office. “We’d have to work with the teachers union, because the teachers union is the only one that’s opposed to it.”

It is unclear whether Trump has secured the support of any Democratic lawmakers, many of whom have balked at his efforts on that front.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, accused Trump and Elon Musk, the de facto head of the Department of Government Efficiency, of “robbing our students and families of critical funding.”

“The effects of Trump and Musk’s slash and burn campaign will be felt across our state—by students and families who suffer from the loss of Department staff working to ensure their rights under federal law, school districts who have to lay off teachers, students who can’t get the help they need to get financial aid, and families who get ripped off because the watchdogs were fired,” Murray said in a statement Wednesday night. “This issue is personal for me, and for every single family. We cannot relent in this fight.”

A coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit last week arguing any attempt by Trump to eliminate the department is unlawful.

“Because neither the President nor his agencies can undo the many acts of Congress that authorize the Department, dictate its responsibilities, and appropriate funds for it to administer, the President’s directive to eliminate the Department of Education—including through the March 11 decimation of the Department’s workforce and any other agency implementation—is an unlawful violation of the separation of powers, and the Executive’s obligation to take care that the law be faithfully executed,” the lawsuit reads.

The Education Department is one of the smallest Cabinet-level departments. Its $268 billion appropriations last year represented 4% of the U.S. budget.

The department does not dictate curricula used in classrooms. It is largely a funding and civil rights enforcement organization, distributing money for schools with high rates of impoverished students and to assist children with disabilities.

It also runs the public student loan program, which has more consumer protections and lower interest rates than private education loan programs.

Trump’s executive order will direct McMahon to ensure the agency’s funds do not go toward programs or activities that advance diversity, equity and inclusion goals or gender ideology.

The Education Department last week announced investigations into more than 50 universities it accused of “engaging in race-exclusionary practices in their graduate programs.”

Diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, is a widely used label applied to efforts to improve workplace culture and create more opportunities for disadvantaged groups, and they are not inherently discriminatory.

National Education Association President Becky Pringle said in a statement Wednesday that Trump’s effort to close the Education Department could have disastrous implications for students across the country.

“If successful, Trump’s continued actions will hurt all students by sending class sizes soaring, cutting job training programs, making higher education more expensive and out of reach for middle class families, taking away special education services for students with disabilities, and gutting student civil rights protections,” Pringle said in a statement.

She accused Trump and Musk of aiming “their wrecking ball at public schools and the futures of the 50 million students in rural, suburban, and urban communities across America to pay for tax handouts for billionaires.”

McMahon said last week that at least three DOGE staffers had been auditing the Education Department.

Keri Rodrigues, the president of the National Parents Union, said dismantling the department would disproportionately affect the most vulnerable communities.

“Let’s be clear: Before federal oversight, millions of children—particularly those with disabilities and those from our most vulnerable communities—were denied the opportunities they deserved,” Rodrigues said in a statement Wednesday night. “The Department of Education was created to ensure that every child, regardless of background or zip code, has access to a public education that prepares them for their future. Eliminating it would roll back decades of progress, leaving countless children behind in an education system that has historically failed the most marginalized.”

Trump has long pledged to dismantle the Education Department, first mentioning the idea during his previous term and campaigning on the promise extensively throughout the 2024 election. He has suggested that states should take over administering educational policy and that other parts of the federal government could absorb current agency responsibilities, like overseeing federal student loans.

“Your state is going to control your children’s education. We’re moving it out of Washington immediately,” Trump said at a campaign event last year in Saginaw, Michigan. “We’re going to do that very fast, and it’s going to be great.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Education

In his war on Harvard, Trump pits the Ivy League against the working class

Published

on


As President Donald Trump’s war on Harvard University intensifies, he is shifting his message in a seeming bid for new allies — apart from punishing the institution, he’s also promising to elevate the working class.

In a post on Truth Social on Monday, Trump proposed sending $3 billion in research funding cut from Harvard to trade schools across the country. “What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!” he wrote.

With that money, he told reporters at the White House on Wednesday, “you can have the best trade schools anywhere in the world.”

It’s unclear how Trump’s proposal would work, where the money would come from or how it would be distributed. The Trump administration didn’t respond to questions.

But while the plan may be untenable, some education experts say pitting research at the world’s wealthiest university against support for low-cost trade schools is a savvy move.

“Politically it’s incredibly effective,” said Nat Malkus, deputy director of education policy at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank. “He communicates in a very brief post on Truth Social where his favor lies, and it lies not with the, you know, elite cosmopolitans at Harvard but with everyday Americans.”

Harvard Campus.
Harvard has lost nearly $3 billion in research grants and contracts this year.Mel Musto / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Trump has blasted elite colleges for years as out-of-touch institutions that don’t do enough to help students avoid debt, often singling out Harvard, even before the current conflict. More recently, the Trump administration has accused Harvard of failing to address antisemitism and issued a mandate for sweeping reforms in whom the university can admit and hire.

When Harvard refused the demands, the administration cut nearly $3 billion in research funding and attempted to end its ability to host international students.

This week’s push represents a new tactic: trying to build public support by implying that Harvard’s success comes at a cost to working Americans.

Most of the federal government’s cuts to Harvard have been to health research, such as studies on cancer and lung disease, which the university has defended as vital. Harvard didn’t respond to a request for comment. In an NPR interview, Harvard President Alan Garber challenged Trump’s approach.

“The real question is how much value does the federal government get from its expenditures on research,” he said. “There is a lot of actual research demonstrating the returns to the American people have been enormous.”

The Trump administration defended the cuts. “American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs,” Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the Education Department, said in a statement.

Improving vocational education has been a priority in both Democratic and Republican administrations. Trump has spoken about it in tandem with his quest to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Last month, he signed an executive order directing federal agencies to coordinate a national strategy on career and technical education.

At her confirmation hearing, Education Secretary Linda McMahon emphasized the value of such schools. “Our vocational and skilled-based training is not a default education; it can be front and center so that students who are inclined to go in that direction actually should be encouraged to do that,” she said.

Linda McMahon.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon has made boosting vocational education a priority.Brendan Smialowski / AFP – Getty Images

Jerome Grant, CEO of Universal Technical Institute Inc., one of the largest private chains of trade schools, said he has had meetings with Education Department officials about increasing support for vocational education, but not at the expense of other colleges. His concern is less about money, he said, than about helping teens and young adults see the benefits of trade school.

“We’re not in the fray with Harvard or anything — we don’t have any beef with any four-year schools,” Grant said. “We just believe that for a lot of kids in America, four-year schools shouldn’t be thought of as their only path after high school.”

The idea that all students should strive for degrees from traditional four-year colleges has given way in recent years amid economic changes and mounting student debt, creating an ascendant bipartisan agreement that other education options should be supported, too.

Trade schools focus on preparing students for certification in specific professions without the general education courses or electives of traditional colleges. So they typically take less time to complete and are less expensive than four-year colleges. Some trade schools are housed at community colleges, largely funded by states and federal student aid.

But many trade schools are also considered for-profit colleges, a sector of higher education that has been scrutinized in the past for failing to deliver on its promises to students.

Education policy experts say the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that Trump urged House Republicans to pass could weaken regulations of the schools — and harm working students. As currently drafted, it would roll back regulations that hold career-training programs accountable if their students don’t earn enough after they graduate and expand Pell Grant use to students at shorter-term and unaccredited education programs. It would also limit Pell Grant eligibility for part-time students, many of whom are working-class.

Neither the White House nor the Education Department responded to questions about the provisions.

Jason Altmire, president of Career Education Colleges and Universities, an association that represents private trade schools and for-profit colleges, said his organization welcomes the reforms in the House bill and Trump’s suggestion of pumping more money into trade schools.

Altmire, a former Democratic House member from Pennsylvania, called the Truth Social post a “continuation of a lot of good things President Trump has done and said” about the schools he represents. (A former chief policy officer at Altmire’s group has been tapped to become the country’s top higher education official.)

He said that his sector of for-profit schools — whether they are vocational or degree-awarding — has been unfairly maligned based on a few extreme examples and that they represent a way forward for many people.

“I don’t view it as a zero sum, but I do view it as a changing of the narrative of what’s the priority of this country when it comes to higher education,” he said.

Carolyn Fast, director of higher education policy at the Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, also supports vocational education and questions the need to pit it against schools like Harvard.

“It’s a false narrative to say the fact that we’re funding research at these colleges means we’re not funding opportunities for people to have good career education,” she said. “Both are good goals for us to have.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

U.S. will ‘aggressively’ revoke Chinese students’ visas, Rubio says

Published

on


HONG KONG — The United States will start “aggressively” revoking the visas of Chinese students, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.

The announcement is the latest move in the Trump administration’s campaign against U.S. universities and international students in particular, after it revoked thousands of students’ visas, detained or deported others over political activism, and sought to bar international students from enrolling at Harvard.

Rubio said in a statement that visa criteria would also be revised to “enhance scrutiny” of all future visa applications from the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese territory of Hong Kong.

“Under President Trump’s leadership, the U.S. State Department will work with the Department of Homeland Security to aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students,” he said.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment outside of business hours. Beijing has previously expressed opposition to the “politicization” of educational exchanges and said it would “safeguard the legitimate rights and interests” of Chinese students overseas.

China is the second-biggest source of international students in the U.S. after India, though numbers have been dropping in recent years amid growing U.S.-China tensions and disruptions from the Covid-19 pandemic. In the 2023-24 academic year there were about 277,000 Chinese students in the U.S., down from a peak of more than 370,000 in 2019-20.

International students make up about 6% of the total population of U.S. higher education overall.

NBC News reported Tuesday that the Trump administration had stopped scheduling new interviews for foreign nationals seeking visas to study in the U.S., citing an internal State Department cable. The cable said the suspension was in preparation for expanded social media screening of applicants.



Source link

Continue Reading

Education

Two UW-Platteville students die in ‘targeted and isolated’ shooting at dorm

Published

on


Two University of Wisconsin-Platteville students died in what officials said Monday was a “targeted and isolated” shooting on campus.

The two 22-year-old students, Kelsie Martin and Hallie Helms, were the only people involved in the incident at an on-campus residence hall, the university said.

Martin, a psychology major and assistant resident director at Wilgus Hall, was airlifted to a University of Wisconsin hospital after she was found with a gunshot wound, according to the statement.

She was later pronounced dead, the school said.

A preliminary autopsy found that Helms, who lived at Wilgus Hall and was an elementary education major, died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the school said in a statement Tuesday night.

Helms was pronounced dead at the scene, according to the statement.

The statement did not provide additional details about the nature of the shooting and asked for people with information to share it with the school’s police department.

Earlier, UW-Platteville Police Chief Joe Hallman said that authorities quickly determined there was no ongoing threat after receiving a 911 call about an incident at Wilgus Hall shortly before 4 p.m. A shelter-in-place order was lifted just after 5 p.m.

Sophomore Eric Sperduto, who lives in Wilgus Hall, told NBC affiliate WMTV of Madison that he saw two girls running from the building after 4 p.m. Monday. He also saw law enforcement in the building.

“It’s just really sad and just sad to think about the families that are affected by this and people that were their friends and stuff that, I guess, that are students just like me that are changed now,” Sperduto told the station.

In a statement, Chancellor Tammy Evetovich mourned the loss of Martin, of Beloit, Wisconsin, and Helms, of Baraboo, Wisconsin, and said the well-being of their community was top of mind.

“Please take the time to take care of yourself and others,” she said.

The university, which has a student body of more than 6,000, canceled final exams and is offering counseling services this week for members of the community, according to the statement.

If you or someone you know is in crisis, call or text 988, or go to 988lifeline.org, to reach the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. You can also call the network, previously known as the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, at 800-273-8255, or visit SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending