Connect with us

Europe

Romania: How America’s online right became obsessed with a low-profile European country

Published

on



CNN
 — 

Romania, a country on Europe’s eastern fringe, is perhaps a surprising focus of attention for a new US administration whose foreign policy priorities include ending the war in Ukraine, reshaping the Middle East and expanding American territory.

Accustomed to flying under the radar, many in the country have been stunned by the Trump administration’s interest in its politics, which rarely garners international attention.

“It’s been unprecedented,” said Oana Popescu-Zamfir, director of the GlobalFocus Center, a think-tank in the capital, Bucharest. She said she cannot recall a time in Romania’s post-Soviet history that its affairs have been so closely scrutinized from afar.

The attention has centered on Calin Georgescu, a Kremlin-friendly ultranationalist candidate in Romania’s abruptly aborted presidential election last year, and Andrew Tate, a “manosphere” celebrity charged with rape and human trafficking by Romanian authorities, allegations that he denies.

The two men have little in common, but their claims to have both been subjected to a “witch hunt” by corrupt liberal institutions – à la President Donald Trump – have helped turn them into cause célèbres in conservative American circles and made an enemy of the Romanian state.

In Georgescu, the online right sees a politician with unorthodox views being denied an election victory on flimsy claims of “foreign interference.” In Tate, it sees an influential man facing trumped-up charges to cut him down. And in Romania, it sees the grossest case of what JD Vance called Europe’s “threat from within.”

The two men have amplified the US vice president’s claim. Since Romania lifted travel restrictions on Tate – reportedly following US pressure – the self-proclaimed misogynist influencer has stressed that the charges against him were fake, comparing his legal troubles to those of Trump.

“Remember what they did to Trump. Remember his accusations. Remember calling him a convicted felon… he was innocent,” Tate said in a video recorded from a sunlounge in Florida. “The greatest men in history have suffered this law fare [sic] and slander,” he said in a post, listing Trump alongside Nelson Mandela and Malcolm X.

Georgescu, who was virtually unknown before Romania’s election, has also compared claims made about his election campaign to those about Trump.

Georgescu waves to supporters after leaving a Bucharest courtroom, March 5, 2025.

The 62-year-old former soil scientist – who opposes sending aid to Ukraine, calls Russian President Vladimir Putin a “patriot” and has voiced sympathy with Romania’s fascist leadership during World War II – unexpectedly won the first-round vote in November. But the constitutional court annulled the election after declassified intelligence reports uncovered possible Russian interference in Georgescu’s TikTok-fueled campaign, which Moscow denied.

After prosecutors charged him with establishing a fascist group and other crimes, which he denies, the electoral bureau banned Georgescu from standing in May’s re-run, outraging American conservatives and causing violent protests in Bucharest.

“It has nothing to do with [Russia],” Georgescu told Fox News last week. “It’s just a copy-paste of the accusations made against Donald Trump.”

While Tate has long championed Trump, Georgescu is a newer convert. As recently as last summer, Georgescu publicly disparaged the US president and spread conspiracy theories about Vance.

But Georgescu soon sensed an opportunity to “ride the Trump wave,” said Corneliu Bjola, professor of digital diplomacy at the University of Oxford.

“[Georgescu] drew inspiration from a style of political discourse that seems to operate without rules – marked by conspiratorial thinking, disinformation and personal attacks against opponents,” Bjola told CNN.

“Trump’s apparent legal immunity, despite his association with the January 6 insurrection and numerous political and personal scandals, further inspires [him and] reinforces a ‘victimhood narrative,’” he added.

But while courting the Trump administration has seemed to benefit both men, it is less clear why some of Trump’s deputies have tried to propel Georgescu to power and, reportedly, used diplomatic capital to free Tate and his brother, Tristan.

Last month, the Financial Times reported, citing sources, that Trump’s special envoy Richard Grenell had pressed Romania’s foreign minister to ease restrictions on the Tate brothers during talks at the Munich Security Conference. Romania’s foreign ministry told CNN there was “no pressure, no solicitations” in the talks. Grenell has also denied pressuring Romanian officials.

Less than two weeks after the conference, Romanian authorities lifted a travel ban on the Tates. The pair had been charged with forming a criminal gang and human trafficking, and Andrew has been charged with rape. In another probe, both are under investigation for money laundering. They have denied wrongdoing.

“Why would you release these people? They are accused of horrible things,” Bjola asked, saying it was a “bad look” for both countries. “The US used to defend Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Lech Walesa, these types of people – and all of a sudden it’s defending alleged sexual predators.”

When asked about the Tates’ return to the US, Trump said he knew “nothing” about it.

Andrew and Tristan Tate arriving in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, February 27, 2025.

Others have said they were not surprised by the Trump administration’s reported efforts to free the Tates.

“Trump and MAGA are a very transactional group. If you do something to help them, they’ll do something to help you,” said Jamie Tahsin, a documentary maker who has reported on Tate for years.

“It’s red meat to the base,” Tahsin told CNN. “They can say, ‘Look, here’s another example of where the mainstream media, the legal system and governments have weaponized the law against an individual because they don’t like the things he says – just like what happened with Trump.”

The Tates are expected to return to Romania for their next court appearance later this month, but some doubt whether they will do so voluntarily, or whether Washington will force them to.

“There’s this general understanding in America right now that if you’re on Trump’s side… you will be OK, regardless of what you’ve done,” Tahsin said.

Standoff with Brussels

Georgescu has also proved valuable to the Trump administration, analysts say. In his blistering Munich speech, Vance singled out Romania as an instance of democratic backsliding in Europe.

“If your democracy can be destroyed by a few hundred thousand dollars of digital advertising from a foreign country, then it wasn’t very strong to begin with,” Vance said, pillorying Romania’s decision to annul its election.

Marietje Schaake, a fellow at Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center, told CNN the American right had turned Georgescu into a “symbol of what’s wrong with European democracy” that “fits into their broader agenda of weakening the European Union.”

Vance addresses a stone-faced audience at the Munich Security Conference, February 14, 2025.

Having shown little interest in the bloc in his first term, Trump has claimed the EU was created solely to “screw the US” and threatened the bloc with huge tariffs.

The Euroskeptic Georgescu has been lionized by American conservatives who share Trump’s ire towards Brussels. While interviewing Georgescu on a podcast, conspiracy theorist Alex Jones said the election annulment was “one of the most naked coups I’ve seen in the last 100 years – and I study history.”

Mario Nawfal, another “manosphere” influencer who interviewed Georgescu, said the authorities’ attempts to stop him running was “the EXACT playbook they tried against Trump.”

As well as undermining trust in elections, Popescu-Zamfir said Georgescu helps the Trump administration because “the more the world looks like it’s ideologically aligned with their beliefs and practices, the more (Trump) gets reconfirmed back home.”

The intense online scrutiny and chaos after postponing its election has left Romania reeling. Many are outraged that Georgescu cannot run in May, while others are dismayed that the Tates might not face justice.

The experience of being caught in the crosshairs of the online US right has led to a strange irony, Popescu-Zamfir said.

Georgescu supporters clash with police outside the Central Election Bureau in Bucharest, March 9, 2025.

Since the collapse of Communism in 1989, Romania has often needed steering from Washington to stay its Euro-Atlantic course. “But now, this is the first time in 35 years, since the regime change, that the Romanian state… decided to keep to the pro-European, pro-democratic path, not because of external pressure, but despite it,” she said.

While the country’s institutions may have weathered the storm for now, Bjola, the Oxford professor, said Romanian politicians have yet to explain satisfactorily why Georgescu has been banned from running, which could provide fertile ground for conspiracies.

“[Their silence] has tremendous cost in a digital age, because if you don’t speak about what happened, this vacuum is going to be filled by Russian and domestic actors who have a different agenda,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Europe

Russia Ukraine truce: The real strategy behind Russia’s sudden truce announcement

Published

on



CNN
 — 

The timing, the brevity, the sudden, unilateral nature of it all. If Ukraine’s allies needed proof of Moscow’s wild cynicism when it comes to peace, the announcement of an immediate truce for Easter provided just that.

It came mere hours after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and his boss president Donald Trump said they would need in the coming days an urgent sign that the Kremlin was serious about peace.

For Russia’s proponents, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s announcement on Saturday looked like a nod to Trump – but the sudden declaration is so riddled with practical flaws, before it even gets out of the box, that it is likely to be simply used by Putin to support his false notion Kyiv does not want his war to stop.

It will be a logistical nightmare for Ukraine‘s forces to suddenly, immediately stop fighting at Putin’s behest. Some front line positions may be in the middle of fierce clashes when this order comes through, and a cessation of this nature likely requires days of preparation and readiness.

Misinformation is bound to confuse troops about the truce’s implementation, how to report or respond to violations, and even what to do when it comes to an end.

It is possible this moment will prove a rare sign that both sides can stop violence for short period. But it is significantly more likely they will both use violations and confusion to show their opponent cannot be trusted. As of Saturday evening local time, Ukrainian officials said Russian strikes had continued in frontline areas.

The ongoing 30-day truce limited to energy infrastructure was born in conditions of complete chaos. The White House announced that “energy and infrastructure” were covered, the Kremlin said they’d immediately stopped attacks on “energy infrastructure”, and Ukraine said the truce started a week later than the Kremlin did. Its execution has been equally mired in mistrust and accusations of breaches.

Moscow made a similar unilateral declaration in January 2023, calling for a day of peace to allow Orthodox Christians to observe Christmas – a move that Kyiv and Western leaders dismissed at the time as a strategic pause for military purposes.

A genuine truce requires negotiation with your opponent, and preparations for it to take hold. The sudden rush of this seems designed entirely to placate the White House demands for some sign that Russia is willing to stop fighting. It will likely feed Trump’s at times pro-Moscow framing of the conflict. It may also cause complexities for Ukraine when they are inevitably accused of violating what Washington may consider to be a goodwill gesture by Moscow.

Ultimately, this brief, likely theoretical, probably rhetorical and entirely unilateral stop to a three-year war, is likely to do more damage to the role of diplomacy in the coming months than it does to support it.



Source link

Continue Reading

Europe

Live updates: Trump news on Iran and Ukraine talks, immigration crackdown, tariffs

Published

on


Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

Delegations from the United States and Iran are holding their second round of high-stakes nuclear talks today.

Officials from both countries met in Oman last weekend for talks mediated by the Gulf Arab nation. This round is being held in Rome, with Oman once again serving as mediator between the US team — led by special envoy Steve Witkoff — and the Iranian one, headed by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

How we got here: A nuclear deal was reached in 2015 between Iran and world powers, including the US. Under the deal, Iran had agreed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of sanctions.

Trump abandoned that deal in 2018, during his first presidential term. Iran retaliated by resuming its nuclear activities and has so far advanced its program of uranium enrichment up to 60% purity, closer to the roughly 90% level that is weapons grade.

Back in the White House, Trump has given Tehran a two-month deadline to reach a new agreement.

What the US is saying: Trump has vowed a “stronger” deal than the original struck in 2015, and has threatened to bomb Iran if it does not come to an agreement with the US.

Since reporting that last weekend’s initial talks were “constructive,” Trump administration officials oscilated this week between a conciliatory approach and more hawkish demands to fully dismantle Tehran’s nuclear capabilities.

What Iran is saying: Iran this week doubled down on its right to enrich uranium and accused the Trump administration of sending mixed signals.

Iranian media has reported that Tehran had set strict terms ahead of the talks with the US, saying that “red lines” include “threatening language” by the Trump administration and “excessive demands regarding Iran’s nuclear program.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Europe

Russia sentences 19-year-old woman to nearly three years in a penal colony after poetic anti-war protest

Published

on



CNN
 — 

A St Petersburg court has sentenced a 19-year-old woman to nearly three years in a penal colony after she was accused of repeatedly “discrediting” the Russian army, including by gluing a quotation on a statue of a Ukrainian poet.

Darya Kozyreva was sentenced to two years and eight months, the Joint Press Service of Courts in St. Petersburg said in statement Friday.

Kozyreva was arrested on February 24, 2024, after she glued a verse by Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko onto his monument in St Petersburg, according to OVD-Info, an independent Russian human rights group.

The verse from Shevchenko’s My Testament read, “Oh bury me, then rise ye up / And break your heavy chains / And water with the tyrants’ blood / The freedom you have gained,” OVD-Info said.

A second case was brought against her in August 2024, following an interview with Radio Free Europe in which she called Russia’s war in Ukraine “monstrous” and “criminal,” OVD-Info said.

During one of her hearings, the teenager maintained that she had merely recited a poem, and pasted a quote in Ukrainian, “nothing more,” the court press service said.

The anti-war activist has had previous run-ins with the law, having been detained in December 2022 while still at high school for writing, “Murderers, you bombed it. Judases,” on an installation dedicated to the twinning of the Russian city of St Petersburg and Ukraine’s Mariupol, the rights group said.

She was then fined for “discreditation” a year later and expelled from university for a post she made on a Russian social media platform discussing the “imperialist nature of the war,” according to Memorial, one of the country’s most respected human rights organizations.

Describing Kozyreva as a political prisoner, Memorial condemned the charges against her as “absurd” in a statement last year, saying they were aimed at suppressing dissent.

Prosecutors had been seeking a six-year sentence for Kozyreva, Russian independent media channel, SOTA Vision, reported from inside the courtroom. Video footage by Reuters showed Kozyreva smiling and waving to supporters as she left the court.

Kozyreva’s lawyer told Reuters they would likely appeal.

The verdict was condemned by Amnesty International’s Russia Director Natalia Zviagina as “another chilling reminder of how far the Russian authorities will go to silence peaceful opposition to their war in Ukraine.”

“Daria Kozyreva is being punished for quoting a classic of 19th-century Ukrainian poetry, for speaking out against an unjust war and for refusing to stay silent. We demand the immediate and unconditional release of Daria Kozyreva and everyone imprisoned under ‘war censorship laws,’” Zviagina said in a statement.

Russia has a history of attempting to stifle anti-war dissent among its younger generation. Last year, CNN reported that at least 35 minors have faced politically motivated criminal charges in Russia since 2009, according to OVD-Info. Of those, 23 cases have been initiated since Russia started its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Currently, more than 1,500 people are imprisoned on political grounds in Russia, according to a tally by OVD-Info, with Moscow’s crackdown on dissent escalating since the war began. Between then and December 2024, at least 20,070 people were detained for anti-war views, and there were 9,369 cases of “discrediting the army,” relating to actions including social media posts or wearing clothes with Ukrainian flag symbols, according to OVD-Info.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending